Analysis of the Civil Liability of the Securities and Exchange Organization Toward Shareholders: A Comparative Study with the Legal System of the United Kingdom

Authors

    Morteza Bahadoran Shirvan Ph.D student, Department of Private Law, Edalat University, Tehran, Iran
    Shahin Shami Aghdam * PhD, Department of Private Law, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran shamiaghdam@gmail.com

Keywords:

stock exchange organization, Civil liability, shareholders, comparative law, England, compensation, market supervision, information transparency

Abstract

This article analyzes the civil liability of the Securities and Exchange Organization (SEO) toward shareholders through a comparative study of the legal systems of Iran and the United Kingdom. In capital markets, the SEO functions as a regulatory authority, bearing responsibilities such as oversight of transactions, dissemination of accurate information, and enforcement of regulations. Negligence in performing these duties—including the release of inaccurate information, unlawful suspension of trading symbols, or inadequate supervision—can give rise to civil liability. In Iranian law, the liability of the SEO is grounded in principles such as no harm (la zarar) and causation (tasbib), whereas in the UK legal system, regulatory bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) protect investor rights through more robust mechanisms. The comparative analysis reveals that in Iran, shareholder claims are generally pursued through general courts and the Administrative Court of Justice; however, these proceedings face challenges such as the lack of specialized tribunals and prolonged litigation processes. In contrast, the UK legal system facilitates compensation through mechanisms like collective actions and professional liability insurance. Moreover, the FCA plays an effective role in indirectly protecting shareholders by supervising information transparency and preventing market abuse. The findings of this study indicate that enhancing transparency, accountability, and the specialization of adjudicatory bodies in Iran could improve the accountability of the SEO and increase shareholder trust. Additionally, adopting the UK’s successful practices in compensation schemes and market oversight may offer a viable path for reforming Iran’s legal framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, M. (2019). Guidelines for Addressing Violations in the Capital Market. Foroughe Ghanoon Legal Institute.

Alcock, A. (2007). 5 years of market abuse. Company Lawyer, 28.

Ansari, B. (2022). Protection of Trade Secrets Against Unauthorized Disclosure. Private Law Research Quarterly, 11IS - 41, 1-42.

Arsalidou, D. (2017). Corporate governance in the Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis: Issues and action. Business Law Review, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.54648/BULA2017007

Barikloo, A. (2006). Civil Liability (Vol. 1). Mizan Publishing.

Burke, S. (2023). A contemporaneous evaluation of the degree of success of the Financial Markets Test Case Scheme in the seminal case of FCA v Arch Insurers and Others (2021) UKSC 1. LSE Law Review, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.462

Chasib Naeem Alkaabi, A., Abedi, M., Darafshan, S. M. M. Q., Bakhshi, A. K., Devine, T., & Eliantonio, M. (2023). The shift in the conditions for the civil responsibility of the parents for the harmful act of the child-a comparative study. TIKRIT UNIVERSITY JOURNAL FOR RIGHTS, 7(4), 181-206. https://doi.org/10.7590/187479818X15282881229829

Eshaghi, M., Rostami Najafabadi, H., & Jalilian, H. (2024). A Comparative Study of Compensation for Moral Damages in the Legal System of Iran and England. International Journal of Ethics and Society, 6(2), 31-40.

Eshtiyagh, V. (2010). Combating Fraud in Securities Markets: A Look at the Legal Order of the Securities Market in the United States of America. Legal Researches, 9(17), 257-284.

Ghorbani, M., & Bagheri, A. (2008). Manipulation of the Securities Market. Public Law Research, 12(29), 301-326.

Goldman, J., Hunt, S., Minter, P., Suntheim, F., & Zaman, Q. (2014). Why has the FCAs market cleanliness statistic for takeover announcements decreased since 2009? (Vol. 4).

Hassani, M. (2017). Auditor's Economic Dependence and the Quality of Financial Reporting; Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange. 7th National Conference on Management, Economics and Accounting, Tabriz.

Hosseini, A. (2021). Civil Liability and its Comparative Study in Iranian and French Law. International Conference of Shiraz University,

Jandari, Y. (2019). Compliance in global markets essay: the importance of identifying and preventing market abuse, and the role of compliance and regulators in achieving this. QMLJ, 10, 95.

Jourdan, P. (2007). Analysis of Judicial Practice in the Field of Civil Liability (Vol. 1). Mizan Publishing.

Katouzian, N. (2017). Introductory Course on Civil Law: Legal Events - Civil Liability (Vol. 1). Ganj Danesh Publishing.

Katouzian, N. (2023). Extra-Contractual Obligations - Civil Liability, Volume 3: Liability InsuranceVL - 3 (Vol. 4). Ganj Danesh Publishing.

Khorshidi, S. (2021). A Brief Look at the Impact of Error in Transactions. International Conference on Jurisprudence, Law and Religious StudiesVL - 4,

McConnell, P., & Blacker, K. (2012). Systemic operational risk: the UK payment protection insurance scandal. The Journal of Operational Risk, 7(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2012.104

Molaei, N. (2023). Comparative Study of the Legal Effects of the Binding Arbitration Clause, Subject of Clause © of Article 53 of the General Conditions of the Contract with the Transactions Regulations of Khuzestan Steel Company. First International Conference on Advocacy, Law and Humanities, Hamedan.

Mousavi Bojnourdi, S. M. (2003). The Legitimacy of Damages for Delay in Payment. Matin, 5(19), 1-19.

Okoye, A. (2024). Modern slavery statements, corporate disclosures and the potential to regulate false, misleading or incomplete statements. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 35(1), 30-41.

Paduszynska, M. (2019). Misselling in the Financial Sector-the Example of the United Kingdom and Poland.

Rajati Farouji, A. A., & Hosseini, S. (2021). Analyzing the Verdict of the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court in Addressing Complaints Against the Securities and Exchange Organization. First Conference on Law, Political Science and Humanities,

Rezaei, A. (2006). Trading Regulations in the Tehran Stock Exchange. Approved by the High Council of the Stock Exchange and Securities.

Sasso, L. (2008). Listing and Disclosure Rules in UK: some recent changes (Vol. 2).

Semenova, M. (2008). Information sharing in credit markets: Incentives for incorrect information reporting. Comparative Economic Studies, 50, 381-415. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.10

Wilson, G., & Wilson, S. (2013). The FSA,"credible deterrence", and criminal enforcement-a "haphazard pursuit"? Journal of Financial Crime, 21IS - 1, 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2013-0007

Winship, V., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2018). An empirical study of admissions in SEC settlements. Ariz. L. Rev., 60, 1.

Yazdanian, A. (2010). Comparative Study of the Civil Liability of the Building Owner in Iranian and French Law. Private Law Studies, 40(3), 375-393.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

Submitted

2025-02-19

Revised

2025-05-24

Accepted

2025-06-02

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Bahadoran Shirvan, . M. ., & Shami Aghdam, S. (1404). Analysis of the Civil Liability of the Securities and Exchange Organization Toward Shareholders: A Comparative Study with the Legal System of the United Kingdom. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-20. https://jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/207

Similar Articles

1-10 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.