Reconstructing the Rule of Law in Transitional Societies: The Role of the Principle of Due Process of Law in Achieving Post-Structural Justice
Keywords:
Due Process of Law, Transitional Justice, Post-structural Justice, Rule of Law, Post-conflict Societies, Legal LegitimacyAbstract
The reconstruction of legal and political order in transitional societies requires the establishment of fundamental principles that guarantee justice, legal legitimacy, and public trust. Among these, the principle of due process of law has evolved beyond a merely procedural rule to become a substantive criterion for assessing the legitimacy of emerging legal orders during transitions. This article, adopting a descriptive–analytical approach and utilizing comparative methodology, examines the position of this principle within the framework of post-structural justice and its relation to the concept of the rule of law in post-authoritarian contexts. Within the article’s theoretical framework, the evolution of the concept of due process of law in international legal instruments and the jurisprudence of human rights courts is explored, along with its correlation to the rule of law under exceptional circumstances. Subsequently, by analyzing the experiences of four selected countries—Rwanda, South Africa, Iraq, and the former Yugoslavia—it is demonstrated that the observance or neglect of this principle has a direct impact on the success or failure of transitional justice mechanisms, public trust, and the legitimacy of newly established legal structures. The article emphasizes that any form of political compromise, general amnesty, or design of temporary justice institutions that lacks a procedural and legal framework rooted in due process will not only fail to deliver justice but also risk re-instigating instability. Finally, the article offers strategic recommendations for institutionalizing this principle in international law, designing oversight mechanisms, reforming judicial procedures, and strengthening legal doctrines in support of this norm. The article concludes that the institutionalization of the principle of due process of law is a prerequisite for establishing the rule of law and achieving justice in transitional societies.
Downloads
References
Alston, P. (2005). The transformation of human rights in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. NYU Press.
Amnesty International. (2005). Iraq: Fair trial guarantees lacking at the Special Tribunal.
Bernath, J. (2021). Transitional justice and the governance of postwar legitimacy: Rethinking the justice-peace nexus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 555-582.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Empire of Law. Ney Publishing.
Forrest, R. (2007). The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Columbia University Press.
Franck, T. M. (1995). Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford University Press.
Freitas, P. (2021). Institutional design and public trust in fragile states. Cambridge Journal of Law and Policy, 26(2), 211-230.
Ghazizadeh, A. (2011). A comparative study of the right to a fair trial in international documents and Iranian domestic law. Journal of Public Law Research, 14(3), 45-76.
Gray, P. (2020). Due process as social reconstruction: A comparative view of post-structural justice. Transitional Justice Review, 7(1), 22-49.
Hirsch, F. (2019). Law's language and social repair: Reflections on reconciliation tribunals in Sierra Leone and Rwanda. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 91-120.
Kaufman, Z. (2020). The rule of law in transitional justice: Due process as legitimacy. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(2), 210-233.
Menne, D. (2013). Human Rights Treaty Bodies and Due Process. Cambridge University Press.
Minow, M. (1998). Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence. Beacon Press.
O'Regan, M. (2022). Fair trial and public trust in post-authoritarian societies. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 16(1), 44-67.
Piryaei, M. (2018). Transitional Justice in International Law: Foundations, Mechanisms, and Experiences. Khorsandi Publications.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Ney Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100648.001.0001
Tomuschat, C. (2008). Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 بهزاد آقاخانلو, حسین رستمزاد (نویسنده)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.