Promotion of a Luxurious Lifestyle and Extravagance in the Media and Other Platforms from the Perspective of Primary and Secondary Islamic Jurisprudential Rulings

Authors

    Forough Mir Parsa Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Zah.C, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
    Zeinab Sancholi * Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Zah.C, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran. z.sanchooli@iau.ac.ir
    Saeed Sharafuddin Tabatabai Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Zah.C, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.

Keywords:

luxury life, luxury, media, primary jurisprudence, secondary jurisprudence

Abstract

The promotion of a luxurious lifestyle and extravagance in the media and other digital platforms is an issue that, particularly from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, requires thorough and in-depth examination. With their extensive persuasive power, media outlets can effectively introduce new standards for success and happiness, which may lead to the encouragement of consumerist and ostentatious behaviors. From a jurisprudential standpoint, such advertising is in conflict with the principles of contentment (qanāʿah), moderation (iʿtidāl), and asceticism (zuhd). The objective of this study is to examine the promotion of a luxurious lifestyle and extravagance in the media and other platforms within the framework of primary (fiqh al-awwalī) and secondary (fiqh al-thānawī) jurisprudential rulings. The nature of this research seeks to understand how media and digital platforms influence the promotion of luxurious and consumerist lifestyles and to assess these influences within the framework of Islamic jurisprudential principles. The findings of this study indicate that analyzing the promotion of a luxurious lifestyle and extravagance in the media from a jurisprudential perspective involves examining the effects of this phenomenon on Islamic principles. Through their influential capacity, media outlets can introduce new consumption patterns that may contradict the principles of contentment, moderation, and asceticism. The promotion of a luxurious lifestyle can lead to increased demand for excessive consumption, the creation of economic inequalities, and social pressure—issues that conflict with social justice in Islamic jurisprudence. To counter these negative effects, media outlets should align their content with Islamic principles and promote the values of contentment and responsible consumption to help preserve cultural and social balance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almasi, N. A. (2019). Private International Law. Mizan Publications.

Amir Mozzi, A. (2014). International Arbitration in Commercial Disputes. Dadgostar Publishing.

Asouzu, A. A. (1995). A Threat to Arbitral Integrity. Journal of International Arbitration, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA1995035

Gaillard, E. (1992). Transnational Rules in International Commercial Arbitration. Seminar held in Paris on 23 October 1992,

Habibi Mojandeh, M. (2019a). Foreign Investment Law: Reconciliation of Policy and Principles. Mofid University Press.

Habibi Mojandeh, M. (2019b). International Economic Law. Jungle Publications.

Habibi Mojandeh, M. (2019c). Principles of Public International Law. Mofid University Press.

Kleinheisterkamp, J. (2005). International Commercial Arbitration in Latin America. Oceana. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/international-commercial-arbitration-in-latin-america-9780379215366?cc=fr&lang=en&

Lane, P. M. M. (1994). The Appointment of an Arbitrator, Contract or Status? Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal.

Lew, J. D. M. (1978). Applicable Law in International Commercial Arbitration: A Study in Commercial Arbitration Awards. Oceana. https://books.google.com/books/about/Applicable_Law_in_International_Commerci.html?id=nRPEQgAACAAJ

Lew, J. D. M., Mistelis, L. A., & Kroll, S. M. (2003). Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law International. https://books.google.com/books/about/Comparative_International_Commercial_Arb.html?id=b1OgnDQ2UnwC

Lionnet, K. (1999). The Arbitrators Contract. Arbitration International, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.2.161

Mann, F. A. (1986). Lex Facit Arbitrium. Arbitration International, 2(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.3.241

Mistelis, L. (2001). ADR in England and Wales. American Review of International Arbitration, 12. https://arbitrationlaw.com/library/adr-england-and-wales-vol-12-no-2-aria-2001

Mustill, M. J., & Boyd, S. C. (2001). Commercial Arbitration. Butterworths. https://books.google.com/books/about/Commercial_Arbitration.html?id=8rWSPQAACAAJ

Nikbakht, H. R. (2014). International Commercial Arbitration. Institute for Trade Studies and Research.

Onyema, E. (2010). International Commercial Arbitration and the Arbitrator's Contract. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203859919

Paulsson, J. (1981). Arbitration Unbound - Award Detached From the Law of its Country of Origin. International Comparative Law Quarterly, 30. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/30.2.358

Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (1999). The Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. Sweet & Maxwell. https://books.google.com/books/about/Law_and_Practice_of_International_Commer.html?id=V-aVzgEACAAJ

Rubino-Sammartano, M. (1992). Amiable Compositeur (Joint Mandate to Settle) and Ex Bono at Aequo (Discretional Authority to Mitigate Strict Law) Apparent Synonyms Revisited. Journal of International Arbitration, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA1992001

Smith, M. (1992). Contractual Obligations Owed by and to Arbitrators: Model Terms of Appointment. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/8.1.17

Solhchi, M. A., & Nejandi Monesh, H. (2012). Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes. Mizan Publishing.

Tang, H., & Wang, S. C. (1998). PR China. In J. Paulsson (Ed.), International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration Supp.

Webster, T. H. (2003). Party Control in International Arbitration. Arbitration International, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/19.2.119

Yu, H. L., & Sauzier, E. (2000). From Arbitrator's Immunity to the Fifth Theory of International Commercial Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Review, 3(4). https://www.stir.ac.uk/research/hub/publication/707675#details

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

Submitted

2025-06-05

Revised

2025-09-09

Accepted

2025-09-16

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Mir Parsa, F. ., Sancholi, Z., & Sharafuddin Tabatabai, S. . (1405). Promotion of a Luxurious Lifestyle and Extravagance in the Media and Other Platforms from the Perspective of Primary and Secondary Islamic Jurisprudential Rulings. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-18. https://jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/276

Similar Articles

1-10 of 105

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.