The Concept of Legal Entitlement in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice on Continental Shelf Disputes with Emphasis on Iran’s Rights

Authors

    Sasan Aalizadeh Department of International Law, Bu.C., Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran.
    Abbas Barzegarzadeh * Department of International Law, Bu.C., Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran. abbas.barzegar1360@iau.ac.ir
    Abdolmohammad Afroogh Department of International Law, Borazjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dashtestan, Iran.

Keywords:

Entitlement, Property Rights, International Court of Justice, Continental Shelf Disputes, Principles of Equity, Iranian Maritime Law

Abstract

The concept of being entitled in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) regarding continental shelf disputes essentially refers to the existence of a legitimate and specific right of a state, which, according to the principles of international law, pertains to a defined geographical area and maritime interests. In the Court’s decisions, states’ rights over the continental shelf—particularly within the 200-nautical-mile limit—are recognized as rights that cannot be extended indefinitely to the detriment of neighboring states. The ICJ has affirmed that states’ claims over the continental shelf must be based on provable legal and scientific principles and standards, and that a state’s rights cannot infringe upon the equivalent rights of other states in marine areas. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the author concludes that in cases related to Iran’s continental shelf, the International Court of Justice has acknowledged Iran’s right to delimit its continental shelf up to 200 nautical miles and has emphasized that any extension beyond this limit must be consistent with the rights of other states. In its rulings, the Court has also treated the concept of entitlement as a legal right—not merely a political or technical claim—and has considered the existence of a legal dispute between states as a prerequisite for examining its jurisdiction. In this regard, the Court has underscored that the concept of entitlement must be grounded in scientific evidence, customary law, and international practice, and must be combined with the principle of good faith and mutual respect for the rights of other states. Concerning the legal dimension of the entitlement concept, the Court has contributed to the preservation and assurance of the rights of states such as Iran in determining the boundaries of their continental shelf through dynamic interpretation and the application of international legal principles. The concept of entitlement in continental shelf cases represents a combination of legal rights, scientific criteria, and the requirements of good faith, which has been clarified and affirmed in the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice for the resolution of maritime boundary disputes, including Iran’s maritime rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalizadeh, S., Barzegarzadeh, A., & Afrogh, A. (2024). Examining the Principle of Equity in the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf with Emphasis on the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice: Proposing a Hybrid Model for Dispute Resolution in the Persian Gulf. Legal Studies in Digital Age, 3(3), 14-36. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.lsda.3.3.8

Alizadeh, S., & Zamani, S. Q. (2024). Revisiting the Concept of Stakeholder in Light of ECHR Jurisprudence. Public Law Research, 16, 1-19.

Azarakhsh, M. (2022). Referring Continental Shelf Disputes to the International Court of Justice. International Law Publications.

Azarkasht, M., Zarei, M., & Vojdani Esghavi, H. (2022). Delimitation of the Persian Gulf Continental Shelf in Light of International Law (With a Focus on Security in Maritime Zones Delimitation). Maritime Security Journal, 49, 57-80.

Behjati, M. (2024). The Principle of Non-Cutoff: A Fundamental Rule in Maritime Delimitation. Legal Civilization, 7, 113-130.

Bisson, L., Gustafson Juras, C., Noyes, J. E., & Franks, E. (2014). The International Law of the Sea. Jangal.

Dehghani, R. (2009). Continental Shelf Delimitation in the Persian Gulf.

Esfehad, S., & Najafi, A. (2019). Challenges of Enclosed and Semi-Enclosed Maritime Zones in the Persian Gulf. International Law Studies Journal, 12(3), 45-67.

Evans, M., & Ioannides, N. A. (2023). The International Court of Justice and the Law of the Sea Dispute Settlement System. In S. Achilles & M. Lisa (Eds.), Research Handbook on the International Court of Justice. Edward Elgar.

Hashemi, R. (2019). The Role of Mediation and Arbitration in Continental Shelf Dispute Settlement. Journal of International Law and Arbitration, 11(2), 60-78.

Hayati, S. (2017). Jurisdiction of the ICJ and ITLOS in Maritime Delimitation (Publication Number Master's thesis) Shiraz University].

Heydar, A., & Daramir, M. (2021). Overlapping Continental Shelf Claims Among Neighboring States. Border and Maritime Studies, 8(2), 78-94.

Jafari Valadani, A. (2015). Maritime Border Separation of Iran in the Persian Gulf with Emphasis on Joint Oil and Gas Fields. Global Politics, 14, 39-72.

Kazemi, A., & Asghari Marzidareh, Z. (2023). The Role of ITLOS in Resolving Disputes on Navigation, Provisional Measures, and Delimitation. Futures Studies and Policy Planning, 31, 57-79.

Khani Bahador, S. (2023). The 1982 Convention and the Delimitation of the Continental Shelf. University of Tehran Press.

Khodaparast, Y., & Sayyadi, M. (2017). Joint Oil and Gas Fields of Iran: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Outlook. Political Sciences & International Relations Press.

Kiani, E. (2016). Legal Regime Governing the Persian Gulf (Status of Maritime Border Delimitation). 7th International Conference on Economics and Management,

Klein, N. (2021). Iran and Its Encounters with the International Court of Justice. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 21(3), 620.

Moeini, H. (2021). The Role of the ICJ in Resolving Continental Shelf Disputes. International Arbitration Journal, 15(3), 68-85.

Moeini, M. (2022). Interpretation of the ICJ on International Maritime Law Principles. Public International Law Journal, 13(2), 88-102.

Mohammadi, H. (2023). Dispute Resolution Strategies Between Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait Over Joint Exploitation of the Arash Oil and Gas Field (Publication Number Master's thesis) Payam Noor University, Semnan Province].

Piri Damaq, M., & Razmpa, S. (2019). Exploitation of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources in the Persian Gulf under the Law of the Sea and the Kuwait Regional Convention. Energy Law Studies, 5, 254-278.

Pouzanjani, R. (2024). Issues in Collecting and Analyzing Geophysical and Hydrographic Data in the Continental Shelf. Marine Sciences Journal, 12(2), 75-92.

Rahmati, M., & Naseri, A. (2020). Border Challenges in the Persian Gulf and Legal Solutions. Center for Strategic Studies.

Rezaei Pouzanjani, H. (2024). The Role of Geophysical Data in Continental Shelf Delimitation. Earth and Sea Sciences Journal, 20(2), 65-83.

Riyazi, J. (2022). Baselines and Their Determination in the 1982 Convention. Maritime Law Quarterly, 19(2), 56-72.

Rothwell, D. R., & Stephens, T. (2016). The International Law of the Sea. Hart Publishing.

Sabernejad, M. (2019). The Principle of Equity in Continental Shelf Delimitation. Maritime Law Journal, 10(4), 112-128.

Salehi, J. (2021). Legal Aspects of Submarine Communication Cables: From Conflicting Interests to Coastal State Sovereignty. Energy Law Studies, 7, 119-136.

Sedaghat, A. (2018). Jurisdiction of Coastal States Over Legal Claims in the Continental Shelf Zone (Publication Number Master's thesis) Islamic Azad University, Garmi Branch].

Sirafi, S. (2015). Defining the Outer Limit of the Continental Shelf: Article 76 of the Law of the Sea Convention. Public Law Studies, 1, 123-148.

Sirafi, S. (2021). Scope of Compulsory Dispute Settlement Under the Law of the Sea Convention in Light of Judicial and Arbitral Rulings. International Legal Journal, 38, 181-214.

Sirafi, S. (2023). Revisiting Paragraph 3 of Article 121 of the Law of the Sea Convention: With Reference to the South China Sea Arbitration and Iran's Undelimited Maritime Boundaries. International Legal Journal, 40, 23-45.

Sirghani, M., & Jalilian, R. (2022). International Legal Rules for Oil Resource Exploitation in Maritime Areas. Legal Studies Quarterly, 60, 114-136.

Sohrabi Malayoosefi, F. (2022). The Concept of Continental Shelf in the International Law of the Sea. International Law Press.

Tonkaboni, M. (2021). The Role of the 1982 Convention in Continental Shelf Delimitation in Semi-Enclosed Areas. International Maritime Law Journal, 16(1), 55-73.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-24

Submitted

2025-06-08

Revised

2025-09-03

Accepted

2025-09-11

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Aalizadeh, S. ., Barzegarzadeh, A., & Afroogh, A. . (1405). The Concept of Legal Entitlement in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice on Continental Shelf Disputes with Emphasis on Iran’s Rights. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-18. https://jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/235

Similar Articles

1-10 of 183

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.