Obstacles and Strategies for International Criminal Support for Ukraine Against Russian Attacks

Authors

    Somayeh Tafaghodi Zare * Faculty member, Law Department, Baharestan Branch, Payam Noor University, Baharestan, Iran. somaye_tafaghodi@pnu.ac.ir
    Mohammad Ghanbari Master's Degree, Department of Private Law, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Mojgan Mohammadi Master's Degree, Department of Computer (Software), Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran

Keywords:

Criminal protection, international community, Ukrainian war, Russian attacks

Abstract

The crimes committed between Ukrainian and Russian forces represent one of the deadliest conflicts and armed hostilities in the past decade. The United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine has identified the hostilities in Eastern Ukraine as a grave violation of jus cogens norms under international law. This invasion has faced widespread international condemnation, including new sanctions against Russia, which have triggered a financial crisis within the country. From the perspective of international criminal law, Russia’s aggression against Ukraine constitutes a clear violation of the prohibition on the use of force—one of the most fundamental principles of international criminal law that warns states against imposing arbitrary will and unjustifiable sovereignty over others. The most effective international legal response to this aggression is the cooperation of states in sanctioning and condemning Russia, as it has acted contrary to universally accepted international principles. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has once again demonstrated that although there are still obstacles to enforcing the laws governing the use of force, these laws unequivocally establish the illegality of Russia’s actions. At the same time, the invasion reinforces the ongoing central role of the law of armed conflict as a foundational pillar of the contemporary international legal order. Therefore, international law demands a special and insightful form of support—one capable of reinforcing the legal principles that govern state conduct and restraining their arbitrary and self-serving judgments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Benedek, V., Bílková, V., & SassOli, M. (2022). Report on Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity Committed in Ukraine since 24 February 2022. https://www.osce.org/odihr/515868

Cottier, T. (2022). Ukraine and the Responsibility to Protect. https://suisse-en-europe.ch/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Memorandum-R2P Ukraine-190322

Faghih Habibi, A. (2017). The Evolution of the Concept of National Sovereignty of States in Light of the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine. Journal of International Relations Research, 1(25), 149-173.

Ghadir, M., & Rashnavadi, M. (2024). Recent Developments in the Crime of Aggression in International Law. Journal of Legal Research, 59.

Ilkhanipour, A., & Salehi, A. (2023). Application of the Responsibility to Protect Theory in the Ukraine-Russia Conflict. International Research Quarterly, 51.

Islami, R., & Abedi, A. (2016). The Customary Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in the Judicial Practice of International Criminal Courts with Emphasis on the Judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Legal Research, 79.

Janipour, M., & Ladmakhi, M. (2014). The Expanded Concept of Criminal Acts in International Criminal Law. Criminal Law Research, 6.

Mirabbasi, S. M. (2017). International Adjudications, the International Court of Justice in Theory and Practice. Javidaneh Publications.

Mousazadeh, R., & Hosseinzadeh, S. (2020). Evaluating the Performance of the United Nations Security Council in Utilizing the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 50(2), 465-490.

Namamian, P., & Tavassoli Naeini, M. (2021). The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in Adjudicating War Crimes in Ukraine. Legal Research Journal, 93.

Neville, A. (2022). European Parliament, Russia's war on Ukraine: Investigating and prosecuting international crime. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2022)733525

Seifzadeh, F., Zamani, S. G., Savari, H., & Raei, M. (2018). State Immunity in Light of the Responsibility to Protect Doctrine. Public Law Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 121-138.

Sharifi Tarazkohi, H., & Farzaneh, Y. (2014). Possibility or Impossibility of the Responsibility to Protect Theory in the Islamic Legal SystemJO - Journal of International Law. 4(13), 343-369.

Trahan, J. (2023). The Need for an International Tribunal on the Crime of Aggression Regarding the Situation in Ukraine. Fordham International Law Journal, 46(5), 671-689. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol46/iss5/5

Ziaee Bigdeli, M. (2020). Public International Law. Ganj-e Danesh.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-06

Submitted

2024-07-27

Revised

2024-10-16

Accepted

2024-10-27

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Tafaghodi Zare, S., Ghanbari, M. ., & Mohammadi, M. . (1403). Obstacles and Strategies for International Criminal Support for Ukraine Against Russian Attacks. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 2(3), 274-291. https://jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/213

Similar Articles

1-10 of 85

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.