Comparative Analysis of Human Rights in Islamic Jurisprudence and International Instruments

Abstract

Human rights, as a cornerstone of international law, pose challenges when aligned with the principles of Islamic jurisprudence. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the foundations of human rights in Islamic jurisprudence and international instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Key principles such as justice, human dignity, and the right to life are analyzed and compared across both legal systems. Challenges such as theoretical and practical conflicts between the two frameworks and their resolutions are discussed. The findings reveal that Islamic jurisprudence, emphasizing the objectives of Sharia (Maqasid al-Sharia), holds significant potential for alignment with global human rights principles but requires reinterpretation and modern applications.