Judicial Oversight of the Guardian Council from the Perspective of Legal Standards

Authors

    Iraj Ahmadi Rad PhD student, Department of Public Law, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran.
    Moien Sabahi Goraghani * Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. moiensabahi@yahoo.com
    Tayebeh Balvardi Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Sirjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sirjan, Iran.

Keywords:

Supervision,, Supervision, Guardian Council, Administrative Justice Court

Abstract

Among the essential components of human rights within any administrative and political system is the guarantee of human dignity and respect in interactions with governmental institutions. In this regard, the protection of citizens' rights necessitates the moderation of power, accountability and responsibility of the government and state authorities, and their subjection to the rule of law. Therefore, the incorporation of various oversight mechanisms, such as judicial supervision through ordinary or administrative courts, is foreseen in statutory law. In the Romano-Germanic legal system, or countries inclined toward this model, the High Administrative Court bears the responsibility of judicial review over the enactments and decisions of governmental bodies. The legal system of Iran has likewise followed this approach; however, certain institutions, such as the Guardian Council, have been excluded from the judicial oversight of the Administrative Justice Court. In light of the current legal framework, statutory law provides explicit and unequivocal provisions that allow no room for interpretation. Specifically, according to the note of Article 12 of the Law on the Administrative Justice Court, the enactments and decisions of the Guardian Council are not subject to judicial review. Nevertheless, any statutory provision is open to free legal interpretation, and legal doctrine can serve as a catalyst for transformation in this regard. This implies that the reasons for the Guardian Council’s immunity from oversight, as well as the necessities and requirements for its accountability, must be clarified. In this article, the authors adopt a descriptive-analytical method to examine the issue. As a conclusion, it may be stated that the rule of law, the principle of separation of powers, and the principle of legitimate expectation constitute the foundational justifications for the necessity of subjecting the Guardian Council to judicial review. Preventing the abuse of power, avoiding judicial error, curbing unreasonable decisions, adhering to the principle of proportionality, and prohibiting conduct based on ill intent are all cases that may render oversight over this institution necessary.

Downloads

References

Abbasi Lahiji, B. (2009). Foundations of Constitutional Law. Jungle Publishing; Javdaneh.

Aberham, Y., & Desta, G. M. (2009). Administrative LawPB - Teaching Material, Prepared under the Sponsorship of the Justice and Legal System Research Institute.

Amini, S. (2014). The Oversight Authority of the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court over the Legality of Government Actions Tehran University (Central Campus)]. Tehran.

Behnia, M. (2007). Legitimate Expectations Pardis Qom University].

Fordham, M. (1997). Judicial Review Handbook. John wiley & song LTD.

Gorji Azandaryani, A. A., & Shafiei Sardasht, J. (2013). Non-Reviewable Judicial Oversight of Government Actions. Public Law Knowledge Quarterly, 2(5), 23.

Groves, M., & Lee, H. P. (2007). Australian administrative law: Fundamentals, principles and doctrines. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168618

Hadavand, M. (2002). Judicial Oversight of Administrative Actions from the Perspective of Good Governance Shahid Beheshti University].

Hadavand, M., & Mashhadi, A. (2010). Principles of Administrative Law in Light of the Judgments of the Administrative Justice Court. Khorsandi Publishing.

Rahimi, M. (1978). Iranian Constitution and Principles of Democracy. Amir Kabir Publishing.

Tabatabai Motameni, M. (2003). Public Freedoms and Human Rights. University of Tehran PublishingER -.

Wade, H. W. R., & Forsyth, C. F. (2004). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press.

Waldron, J. (2008). the concept of rule of law.

Zarei, M. H. (2001). The Process of Democratization, Accountability, and Public Administration. Journal of Qom Higher Educational Complex, 3(9).

Zarei, M. H., & Behnia, M. (2011). Reflection on the Applicability of the Principle of Legitimate Expectations in the Administrative Justice Court. Rahbord Journal(61).

Zarei, M. H., & Shojaian, K. (2014). The Principle of Irrationality in Administrative Law and Its Reflection in the Judgments of the Administrative Justice Court. Public Law Research Quarterly, 16(45).

Downloads

Published

2025-05-17

Submitted

2025-02-22

Revised

2025-04-23

Accepted

2025-04-30

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Ahmadi Rad, I. ., Sabahi Goraghani, M., & Balvardi, T. . (1404). Judicial Oversight of the Guardian Council from the Perspective of Legal Standards. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 3(1), 1-16. https://jecjl.com/index.php/jecjl/article/view/136

Similar Articles

1-10 of 44

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.