Jurisprudence of Resistance and Countering Soft Threats to Internal Security

Authors

  • Eftekhar Daneshpour Assistant Professor, Department of Imami Jurisprudence and Law, Faculty of Jurisprudence and Law, University of Religions and Denominations (International University of Islamic Denominations), Tehran, Iran https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5472-1468

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/jecjl.733

Keywords:

Jurisprudence of resistance, internal security, soft threats, soft power, foundations of resistance, counter, strategy

Abstract

The jurisprudence of resistance, as an important branch of Islamic jurisprudence, is concerned with elucidating the Sharia rulings and legal principles governing resistance to oppression, the defense of rights, and steadfastness against aggressors. Using a descriptive-analytical method and library-based sources, this study seeks to evaluate and explain a theoretical framework grounded in the doctrine of authentic resistance in Islamic thought for confronting soft warfare and maintaining internal security and stability. The findings indicate that the jurisprudence of resistance rests on robust foundations, including the principle of negation of domination (nafy al-sabil), the principle of preventing hostile infiltration, the obligation to defend the integrity of Islam (defensive jihad), the principle of no harm (la darar), the principle of preserving the social and political order, the principle of justice, and the principle of dignity. Each of these principles has considerable potential for developing a theoretical framework for countering soft threats. The culture of resistance, through such components as opposition to hegemonic domination, a jihad-oriented spirit, and the revitalization of religious identity, also provides a clear perspective for achieving sustainable internal security. The Islamic defense system encompasses three categories of jurisprudential propositions—security-generating rules, security-threatening factors, and the rulings and regulations governing warfare—which together provide a comprehensive framework for safeguarding national security. Accordingly, by offering robust theoretical foundations and practical strategies, the jurisprudence of resistance can serve as an effective roadmap for countering soft warfare and strengthening internal security.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi Nik, S. M., & Mozaffari Chinjani, S. F. (2023). An Analytical Reappraisal of the Fundamental Principles and Jurisprudential Foundations of Fiqh al-Muqawamah.

Al-Farahidi, K. i. A. (1988). Al-Ayn. Hijrat Publications.

Al-Hurr al-Amili, M. i. H. (1993). Wasa'il al-Shi'a. Al al-Bayt Institute.

Al-Muzaffar, M. R. (1994). Usul al-Fiqh. Islamic Publications.

Alidoust, A. (2023). Methodology for Deriving Jurisprudential Propositions of Security. National Defense University.

Amiri, A. (2010). Soft Threat. Pegah.

Ansari, M. (1990). Al-Makasib. Dar al-Dhakha'ir.

Asifi, M. M. (2009). Fiqh al-Muqawamah: Dirasah Fiqhiyyah Muqaranah. World Forum for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought.

Bojnourdi, S. H. (1998). Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah. Al-Hadi Publishing.

Bojnourdi, S. M. (2000). Rules of Jurisprudence. Orouj.

Dehkhoda, A. A. (1994). Dehkhoda Dictionary. University of Tehran.

Eftekhari, A. (2010). Cultural Soft War. Imam Sadiq University Press.

Fazel Lankarani, M. J. (2019). Defensive Jihad. Jurisprudence Center of the Pure Imams.

Fazel Meybodi, M. T. (1999). Religion and Freedom. Negah-e Moaser Publications.

Hashemi, S. H. (2011). Soft War: Battle in the Contemporary World. Office of Cultural and Social Studies and Planning, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology.

Hosseinikhaah, S. J., & Khosravi, M. (2022). The Theory of Defensive Jihad in the Thought of Ayatollah Fazel Lankarani. Political Jurisprudence Studies(4).

Ibn al-Athir, M. i. M. (1997). Al-Nihayah fi Gharib al-Hadith. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.

Ibn Faris, A. (1983). Mu'jam Maqayis al-Lughah. Islamic Propagation Office.

Khamenei, S. A. (2019). The Thought of Resistance. Islamic Revolution Publications.

Khomeini, S. R. (1985). Sahifeh-ye Imam. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.

Majnoun Pilehroud, R. (2023). The Discourse of Resistance and Its Impact on the Global Order. International Relations Journal.

Makarem Shirazi, N. (1992). Tafsir-e Nemuneh. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Mehri, M. J. (2024). Jurisprudence of Information and Security (Vol. 2-volume work). Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.

Mirghaderi, S. F., & Kiani, D. (2012). Conceptualizing Resistance in Islamic Political Literature. Political Science Research Journal.

Momen Qomi, M. (2004). Al-Wilayah al-Ilahiyyah al-Islamiyyah. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.

Momeni, A., & Rezazadeh, S. H. (2020). Governmental Jurisprudence and the Expansion of the Discourse of Cultural Resistance. Social Jurisprudence Research, 11(2).

Najafi, M. H. (1983). Jawahir al-Kalam. Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah.

Piroozmand, A. (2025). National Resistance, Soft Confrontation, and Related Issues.

Rajabi, H., & Asadi, H. (2017). The Role of the Culture of Resistance in Internal Security. Politics Quarterly(16).

Safdari, H. (2022). Preliminaries of Soft War / Jurisprudence of Soft War / Book of Jihad. Contemporary Jurisprudence Course

Saheb, M. J. (2005). Religion-Culture Relations in Iranian Society. Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.

Shahid al-Awwal, M. i. M. (1980). Dhikra al-Shi'a fi Ahkam al-Shari'a. Al al-Bayt Institute.

Shariati, R. (2014). Rules of Political Jurisprudence. Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.

Tabatabaei, S. M. H. (1995). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur'an. Islamic Publishing Office.

Zaki, M. A., & Parsania, H. (2023). Conceptual Analysis of Culture and Civilization. Cultural-Social Knowledge(54), 139-154.

Downloads

Publication Timeline

Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Daneshpour, E. (1405). Jurisprudence of Resistance and Countering Soft Threats to Internal Security. The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.61838/jecjl.733