دعاوی حقوقی ایران و آمریکا و تأثیر آن بر روابط دو جانبه

سارا  آفرینی; مسعود مطلبی; امیر هوشنگ  میرکوشش; احمد اشرفی

doi:10.61838/jecjl.3.1.9

Authors

Sara Afarini PhD student, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran. Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7599-0744
Masoud Motallebi Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4854-6542
Amir Hooshang Mirkooshesh Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran. Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8378-184X
Ahmad Ashrafi Assistant Professor, Department of History, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-295X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61838/jecjl.3.1.9

Keywords:

Damage determination regime, Legal disputes, Iran-US relations, International Court of Justice, human rights violations

Abstract

The relationship between Iran and the United States over the past several decades has been shaped by numerous political and legal conflicts. One of the most significant aspects of this relationship involves legal disputes between the two countries, which have expanded following the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the continued state of hostile relations. The present article examines the damage determination regime in legal disputes between Iran and the United States and analyzes the impact of these disputes on their bilateral relations. The central research question is: how have legal disputes and the rulings issued by international judicial bodies—particularly the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and arbitral tribunals—affected the relationship between Iran and the United States? This study employs a qualitative analytical methodology, focusing on the examination of international legal documents, judgments of judicial bodies, and authoritative legal sources, while assessing their political and legal ramifications. The findings indicate that the legal disputes between the two countries—including issues such as human rights violations, terrorism, property confiscation, and military attacks—have contributed to heightened hostility and the deterioration of bilateral relations. Moreover, the United States’ failure to enforce legal rulings and its political interference have further complicated bilateral ties and expanded the scope of new legal claims in both domestic and international courts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbari, A., & Jalali, R. (2013). The History of Iran-U.S. Foreign Relations. Historical Research Journal, 8(21), 43-70.

Boyle, A. F. (1996). U.S. Foreign Policy during the Iran-Iraq War.

Dehghani Firouzabadi, J. (2010). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. SAMT Publishing.

Eftekhari Jahromi, G. (1992). Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Legal Journal(16), 17-72.

Hosseini, A. R. (2010). A Look at Iran-U.S. Relations from the Revolution to the Severance of Political Ties. Yad Ayam Journal(55), 53-66.

Joneidi, L., & Hossein, S. (1999). Comparative Review of the International Commercial Arbitration Law. University of Tehran Publishing.

Mafi, H. (2008). An Analysis of the Performance of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Law and Politics Research, 10(24), 177-223.

Maroosi, A. (2011). Report on the Judgments of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. International Legal Affairs.

Nikfar, M. (2000). Selected Opinions of the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal. Ghoghnoos Publishing.

Rostami, F., & Gholami, H. M. (2016). Reasons for the Continuation of the Iran-U.S. Dispute After the Nuclear Agreement. Global Politics Quarterly, 5(16), 209-242.