Peer-Review Process

The Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence and Law employs a rigorous double-blind peer-review process, designed to uphold the integrity, quality, and impartiality of the research we publish. Each submission is evaluated by two or three independent reviewers, who are experts in the relevant field and are carefully selected to provide objective, constructive feedback. The double-blind process ensures that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous, promoting unbiased assessment based solely on the quality of the manuscript. Reviewers assess submissions on originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and contribution to the field. This thorough process helps authors refine their work, ensuring that only the highest-quality research is published.